Constitutional Convention (Thursday, Feb. 12, 2004)
«Previous Page · 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 · Next Page»
Rep. Travis continued: I thank my friend Sen. Pacheco for our discussion yesterday. He said I want to vote on the amendment, but I have problems. He said do you believe if this becomes law and families who have health plans given by their companies who are not married who are gays will have those plans taken away? I said no. He said the courts will do that when the employers bring this to court. They will say only one man and woman are protected. This is the amendment for the day. I was rude to some people yesterday. I publicly apologize. My colleagues, please let the people vote.
Sen. Havern said I hope this amendment fails. There is a lot
of fear out there. People are afraid of the gay issue. After marriage there is
no sex. We don’t need this amendment on the constitution. You are not going to
find a kinder person than Sen. Travaglini. We are all struggling on this issue.
The governor is a nice guy. He is just dead wrong. This is like a family. When
you raise a family, you treat them the same. You take rights and privileges
away only when they do wrong. What is it that they did that we take something
away from them? My son was on the Beanpot winning team and another son passed
the financial services exam. We are proud. Everyone is. You have to treat every
family member the same or what kind of parent are you? That is why we are
having so much trouble with the compromise. How do you compromise someone’s
rights? How do you say you’re almost equal? I don’t like the visual of me
twenty years from now with me and a bowl of water washing my hands. I don’t
like it. I don’t want to be Pontius Pilate on this one. I don’t need to be. I
am trusting the people. I trust every one of them. Kill this amendment. People
don’t hate the people on the other side. The only thing we all hate is email. We
trust the other side. We trust each other. My kids will say in 20 years they
stayed in the chamber fighting about what? Didn’t they read the constitution? In
the short term this is an arduous vote. If you love public life, where else
would you want to be? This is where you want to be – where history is made. Kill
this amendment. Allow people to get married and love each other. See how it works
out. It will be the biggest non-event in
Members applauded lightly.
KELLY SPEECH – MOTION TO ADJOURN: Rep. Kelly said Liz, this
is for you. By a slim majority last night, you don’t want to amend the constitution
to keep Liz and others as nine tenths of a citizen. Enshrining in the
constitution a document under which she leaves the chamber and doesn’t have the
privilege that other people have cannot possibly jibe with what the
constitution and democracy is all about. The president and vice president got
this issue correct over two years ago when the nation was united after 9/11. There
was no division amongst any of us. The administration decided to afford the
partners of homosexual citizens privileges, survivor benefits. Marriage is not
a right, it’s a privilege. You would not say you are superior to the
gentlewoman from Jamaica Plain. You would never say that to her face. As a
conservative, whenever that happens we should be incredibly appalled at that. I
read that we are going to compromise this out about how integrated into our society
we make Liz. It doesn’t make any sense to me. Is she eight tenths of a citizen?
99.9? Anything less demeans the spirit of
